Analysis of freshman admission survey
As the effect of declining birthrate gradually ferments, many higher education institutions must face the negative impact of enrollment difficulties on operations. Therefore, how to shape the characteristics of schools and cultivate more competitive graduates will be an important issue for today’s higher education institutions. subject. The Admissions Team of the Academic Affairs Office of our school conducts a questionnaire survey when freshmen are admitted to collect admission-related information and understand their views on the school and their plans after entering the university. This will serve as an important reference for the school’s future planning of teaching, tutoring and services.
Our school has implemented the freshman entrance survey since the 1998 academic year, and it has now entered its 7th year. Since the 100 academic year, our office has coordinated with the admissions team of the Academic Affairs Office to integrate the original questions of the two units and add a new “ability assessment” ” and “Future Expectations” so that we can provide pre- and post-test evaluation in the future. At present, in addition to the above two questions each academic year, the survey results of the “Impression Channel” and “School Selection Factors” in the questionnaire will also be analyzed to gain a deeper understanding of the actual factors affecting freshman students. The results will be Provide references to relevant business units.
World University Rankings
The world university ranking systems that our school regularly tracks every year mainly include “Times Higher Education World University Rankings”, “QS World University Rankings” and “U.S. News and World Report’s Best Global Universities” Ranking” (US News & World Report) three items, published in September and October every year. Among them, the “Times Higher Education World University Rankings” will separately rank Asian universities and will be announced in June; the “QS World University Rankings” will also rank Asian universities and disciplines and will be announced in June and September respectively. The “U.S. News & World Report Best Global Universities Ranking” is based on main ranking performance, and then separately ranked according to region, country, and discipline.
Analysis of private school awards and subsidies
In order to improve the quality of private universities and encourage each school to develop the unique characteristics of the school on the basis of sound management and narrow the gap in educational resources between public and private universities, the Ministry of Education has formulated the “Private University Institutions of the Ministry of Education” key points of the business development plan”. Schools that meet these key requirements may submit plans and relevant documents to apply for subsidies. In order to facilitate the allocation of project funds, the Ministry of Education still divides the schools into “comprehensive universities”, “medical schools” and “religious training colleges” according to the nature of each school. Among them, the “comprehensive university” category is divided into three categories based on the number of students. Our school belongs to the “comprehensive university category 1” (hereinafter referred to as the comprehensive category 1).
The Ministry of Education awards award and subsidy amounts based on each school’s performance in various award and subsidy indicators each year. Different from the previous subsidy method, starting from 2013, it has been changed to submit a two-year plan at once, and it is proposed to “simplify school administrative operations”, “strengthen the characteristics of school running”, “strengthen the effectiveness of student aid measures”, and “implement school affairs”. There are six major adjustment directions: “information disclosure”, “relaxing funding expenditure restrictions” and “setting a cap on funding subsidies”. Our school conducts relevant analysis based on the total amount of subsidies announced by each school every year to find out the subsidy amount and related influencing factors of reward and subsidy indicators, as a reference for future school development plan planning.